[PC-BSD Testing] PBIs being compiled?

Julian Elischer julian at freebsd.org
Wed Oct 12 12:54:35 PDT 2011


On 10/12/11 9:19 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 10/12/11 03:24, Serghey Suvorov wrote:
>> Apparently ports require accurate revision
>> for each PCBSD version.
>> For example: Krusader 2x beta from port was installing
>> on my comp 4 hours, and after all my LaTeX and some else
>> were damaged.
>>
>> Serghey
>>
>> On 12 October 2011 07:44, Julian Elischer <julian at freebsd.org
>> <mailto:julian at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     I see a couple of new ones each day but it seems to be very slow..
>>
>>     Still only up to 'N' in categories..
>>
>>     Maybe the answer is to save partial products..
>>
>>     If two PBIs need a particular port maybe it should be saved off
>>     when the
>>     first makes it and just dropped in when the second compilation
>>     needs it??
>>     is that done at the moment?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Because PBI's need to be build with LOCALBASE set differently it's not
> currently possible to just share packages between them :( Unless we
> can figure out a way to compile ports with no LOCALBASE or something
> we can set at runtime...

sounds feasible..  or a relative one?..

>
> --
> Kris Moore
> PC-BSD Software
> iXsystems
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.pcbsd.org
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/testing



More information about the Testing mailing list