[PC-BSD Testing] PBIs being compiled?

Kris Moore kris at pcbsd.org
Wed Oct 12 09:19:47 PDT 2011


On 10/12/11 03:24, Serghey Suvorov wrote:
> Apparently ports require accurate revision
> for each PCBSD version.
> For example: Krusader 2x beta from port was installing
> on my comp 4 hours, and after all my LaTeX and some else
> were damaged.
>
> Serghey
>
> On 12 October 2011 07:44, Julian Elischer <julian at freebsd.org
> <mailto:julian at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
>     I see a couple of new ones each day but it seems to be very slow..
>
>     Still only up to 'N' in categories..
>
>     Maybe the answer is to save partial products..
>
>     If two PBIs need a particular port maybe it should be saved off
>     when the
>     first makes it and just dropped in when  the second compilation
>     needs it??
>     is that done at the moment?
>
>
>

Because PBI's need to be build with LOCALBASE set differently it's not
currently possible to just share packages between them :( Unless we can
figure out a way to compile ports with no LOCALBASE or something we can
set at runtime...

-- 
Kris Moore
PC-BSD Software
iXsystems

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20111012/ce771329/attachment.html>


More information about the Testing mailing list