[PC-BSD Testing] PC-BSD v9.0 64bit update.. failure
kris at pcbsd.org
Fri Aug 19 10:20:39 PDT 2011
On 08/19/2011 04:20, Tigersharke . wrote:
> Hello there..
> Currently I am trying to understand why I couldn't boot the new 64bit
> USBFULL beta1.5 image from my 4Gb stick.. and trying again to write it
> to the stick, just to be sure. Either I have somehow caused the 3.9Gb
> image to take more space or my stick is not 4096Mb. During the
> attempted boot from the menu, it quit shortly after GEOM_PART
> Integrity check failed.
> Here is the output of the USB image burn:
> # dd if=PCBSD9.0-BETA1.5-x64-USBFULL.img of=/dev/da0 bs=5k
> dd: /dev/da0: short write on character device
> dd: /dev/da0: end of device
> 783156+0 records in
> 783155+1 records out
> 4009754624 bytes transferred in 2036.760317 secs (1968692 bytes/sec)
> After it did not boot, I restarted and wanted to check something in my
> 64bit v9.0 beta1 install. I did not expect to see the system update
> manager telling me of an update.
> Unfortunately, the update did not work. This image will be available
> for 30 days: http://imgur.com/gNfZj?full
> My system is a desktop and has both an ethernet and a wifi card. Both
> function fine, and after configuring the security for the wifi, I am
> sure I had network connections on both. However, just to check, I did
> try with lagg enabled/disabled, also with wifi enabled/disabled. I
> also was able to access the ftp.pcbsd.org <http://ftp.pcbsd.org> site
> with konquerer and found the pcbsd.tgz file but was unsure were to put
> it, and then unsure how I could initiate the update (if it is possible
> in this disjointed way). I also looked at the space available and no
> slices were at capacity or actually unable to fit the update file, as
> well as I could determine.
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.pcbsd.org
I may have to shrink that USB image a bit more, seems some sticks don't
really have the "full" 4GB advertised :)
As for the update manager, can you run this as root?
# pc-updatemanager install release-9.0-BETA1.5
Let it run, does it fail or return some sort of error?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Testing