[PC-BSD Testing] New blurb I thought some might like about AMD v Intel

Arthur Koziol A-Koziol at neiu.edu
Mon Jan 4 12:28:36 PST 2010

On 01/04/2010 12:58 PM, Matt Olander wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, doverosx at gmail.com<doverosx at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Arthur Koziol wrote:
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/22683/Intel_Forced_to_Remove_Cripple_AMD_Function_from_Compiler_
>>> Pretty evil if you asked me. Seems Intel is batting a thousand lately.
>>> Hope AMD takes 'em to the cleaners.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Testing mailing list
>>> Testing at lists.pcbsd.org
>>> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/testing
>> Interesting...I thought it was a fact that WAS widely known and the
>> issue remedied by the order of the FTC in 2000-2001? Circa K7 Athlons.
>> Intel seems to be quite evil in how they handle some key operations, of
>> course, the way they have been "handling" business these days has earned
>> their appearance in an OpenBSD song ;).
> It *is* the Intel Compiler, after all. Nobody has to use it and I'm
> not really sure why anybody would try to use it on a non-Intel system
> ;)
> -matt


Bigger picture than just "use something else", imagine all the lost 
revenue for AMD because something showed better benchmarks with Intel 
versus AMD and someone went with Intel as a result. Evil is as evil 
does. It's funny though that when you look at the TOP500, top 3 spots 
run AMD. HA!


More information about the Testing mailing list