[PC-BSD Testing] PCBSD 8.0 Alpha 20091206 x86 - Install Failure & Installer Comments
Arthur Koziol
A-Koziol at neiu.edu
Tue Dec 8 06:13:28 PST 2009
Ian,
Do you know if the firmwares on the CD/DVD devices are up to date? How
about the BIOS, up to date?
Arthur
> The computer was a plain vanilla HP Vectra VL400, PIII @ 1 GHZ, 512 Mb
> RAM, ATI AGP video.
>
> Installing PCBSD 8.0 Alpha 20091206 x86 failed after the first reboot
> (i.e. the reboot which leads to configuring video & xorg.conf). The
> installation screens gave no warning of a pending problem.
>
> The boot process failed right after probing the CD drives (acd0 and
> acd1) and then waited indefinitely. However, the computer was not
> frozen and I could press enter to get to the root prompt.
>
> I looked over the hard disk and was surprised to see there were no
> files installed into /usr. Perhaps this was a bad burn, so I will
> burn another disk, reinstall, and report. Is it also possible that
> the slice was not mounted because the start-up process had not
> proceeded far enough?
>
> I will re-burn, reinstall, and report.
>
> The new installer was nice but the color scheme is rather bland and
> subdued compared with the "old" installer. Of course I am commenting
> on something that is merely cosmetic and not a functional complaint.
> Function was just fine. However, I think the layouts of certain
> screens have the potential to cause missteps, confusion, oversight, or
> omission by novice users attempting to install PC-BSD.
>
>
> Detailed Analysis of the Appearance of Installer Screens:
>
> ===============================
>
> 1. Language Screen -- OK - Obvious what to do.
> ===============================
>
> 2. Keyboard Screen -- OK - Obvious layout and easy to read even
> though a lot of choices are presented.
> ===============================
>
> 3. System Screen --
>
> A. The hint that says "Select installation type" is in a small font,
> anchored at the right margin, and seems almost invisible next to the
> dominating but unrelated icon next to it.
>
> B. The eye does not naturally land on the the first step
> (Install/Upgrade/Restore) because the eye is drawn to the second step
> where you choose either PC-BSD and FreeBSD. That's because of the red
> icons and the spacing between step one and two being so small.
>
> C. In contrast, the third step (Installation Source) is easier to
> "see" because of the huge white space isolating this step from the
> others. The icons are "appropriate" but not large enough to communicate.
>
> D. The starting locations (viz. left to right) of the three steps are
> staggered and lack a certain consistency.
>
> E. RECOMMENDATIONS for System Screen:
>
> i. Move the hint to the left margin, increase the font size, and make
> it bold like the word "System" in the top right part of the screen.
>
> ii. Create a more balanced appearance and easier to follow steps
> using more white space between each step, i.e., move step one down a
> line or two, move step two down some extra lines, and keep the
> distance between step 1 (install), 2 (system) and 3 (source) equal.
> Compare the organization of "System Screen" with the "User Screen" to
> see these points illustrated.
>
> iii. Start each step at a common left margin.
>
> iv. Number each step with a number in a larger, bold font.
> ===============================
>
> 4. Disk Screen --
>
> A. The hint that says "Disk Setup" is in a small font, anchored at
> the right margin, and seems almost invisible next to the dominating
> but unrelated icon next to it.
>
> B. While the "ad0 ........" is obvious to experienced BSD users, it
> is not obvious to a casual user. It would be more obvious if there
> was a label like "Choose the Target Disk" and a hint like "Click the
> down arrow to see other disks"
>
> C. The starting locations (viz. left to right) of the steps are
> staggered and lack consistency.
>
> D. RECOMMENDATIONS for Disk Screen
>
> These are identical to the previous recommendations.
>
> i. Move the hint to the left margin, increase the font size, and make
> it bold like the word "Disk" in the top right part of the screen.
>
> ii. Create a more balanced appearance and easier to follow steps
> using more white space between each step, i.e., move step two
> (auto/customize) up a little, keep the distance between steps equal.
>
> iii. Start each step at a common left margin.
>
> iv. Number each step with a number in a larger, bold font.
> ===============================
>
> 5. User Screen -- Mostly obvious. Good use of white space and boxes,
> has common left margin starting space, and useful prompts. The steps
> could be numbered to maintain consistency with the recommendations
> stated above. Move "User Creation" label to the left.
>
> ===============================
>
> 6. Time Screen -- Obvious and easy. Move "Date & Time to left and
> enlarge font. The screen mentions "Date" but there is no date
> choice. Therefore, drop "Date" from the label.
>
> ===============================
>
> 7. Components Screen -- Obvious and easy. Move "Optional Components"
> to the left and enlarge the font. The panel lacks (a) the ability to
> select more than one component using the <ctrl><left-click> or (b) a
> "select all" choice.
>
> ===============================
>
> 8. Summary Screen
>
> A. Why is it necessary to scroll the summary? There is enough screen
> space to make the report and it would probably communicate better
> without the need to scroll.
>
> B. If it is necessary, then the slider bar should be more obvious
> than white-on-white.
>
> C. I note the summary screen reports that you will be organizing the
> disk with separate-sized slices for /, /var, and /usr. This is
> different from the PC-BSD tradition of a slice for SWAP and the rest
> of the disk dedicated to /.
> ===============================
>
> 9. Installation Screen -- Clear. I miss the pictures.
>
> ===============================
>
> 10. Finished Screen -- Clear.
>
> ===============================
>
>
> OK. Thanks for listening, and did I forget to mention that the boot
> routine is fast even from the DVD?
>
>
> Ian Robinson
> Salem, Ohio
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.pcbsd.org
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/testing
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20091208/45e085be/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Testing
mailing list