[PC-BSD Testing] I agree
milanisko k
vetrisko at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 01:21:57 PDT 2008
Hello,
I agree the 4.1 has got bugs. It might either motivate its users to use
something else or - even better - to contribute. Reporting a problem is a
contribution, too ;)
kind regards,
milan
2008/8/26 <jmdennis at dslextreme.com>
> I agree as I wish that they would be using KDE 3.5 as well. When the
> alphas started to come out they were using this. It was nice because if
> they had a problem you knew it was with pc-bsd. Now you have no idea who
> is causing the problem. I would like to see them include both when it is
> released but know this will probably not happen as those that are using
> kde 4.1 seem to stick with it. I do not like it as it is not easy to
> learn on. I am not only thinking about me but my mother as well. I
> closed down the bar at the bottom and could not get it to open again. I
> am sure that with some effort I would have been able to fix this but some
> things should remain static and this is one of them. I used Mac OS 7 up
> to and including 10.4 so I do not mind change. I could not use it any
> longer since my machine did not support the new upgrades like 10.5 so I
> bought a used system on ebay knowing that I would load Linux on it.
>
> If you still want to use KDE 3.5 and want to use a freebsd version you can
> always use DesktopBSD as they are also testing with freebsd 7 but still
> using the old KDE version. For Linux though you have to pick and chose as
> some will be using KDE 4.1 coming up like Mandriva 2009. You can still
> use Mandriva 2008 and also Pardus 2008 is pretty good as well. I am using
> Debian Lenny beta 2 at the moment and like this as well. They each do
> things different so you have to find some thing that you like. I do not
> mind using KDE 4.1 but I want to be able to install it myself and if I do
> not like it then I can uninstall it.
>
> I do like the idea that KDE had. They wanted to make it easier for those
> writing applications to just be able to worry about there application and
> not the underlying code as they could just use what was written for them
> which would speed up application writing but this does not seem to be the
> case as not much is done for 4.1 yet. When it matures and does what I
> want it to do then I will upgrade but until then I will use an OS that
> does not include it for the time being. I wish you luck in finding some
> thing that works for you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.pcbsd.org
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/testing
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20080826/20f77d65/attachment.html
More information about the Testing
mailing list