[PC-BSD Testing] Testing Digest, Vol 8, Issue 35

Ahmad Arafat Abdullah trunasuci at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 21:02:21 PDT 2007

ermm Kris,

i think so.. most and i think the look and feel is the same with pico.
So pico users just can migrate blindly ( I was a pico users before, also
vi/vim  ).
Anyway most of linux distros use nano instead of pico, and I'm not sure

I read that nano is pico clone, maybe fork or maybe not I can't sure abt it,
but the
look and "face" is same


On 8/31/07, Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.com> wrote:
> Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote:
> > Ermm.. Kris
> >
> > From your point of view ( and also both of u of course), which one is
> > better? Pico or Nano? seems like Nano is based on pico but have some
> > enhancements ( that's from what i read )
> >
> >
> To be honest I've not tried Nano personally, I used pico a lot back in
> the day and then switched to vi. Is it just a fork of pico with some
> added functionality?
> --
> Kris Moore
> PC-BSD Software
> http://www.pcbsd.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20070831/9c4639d4/attachment.html>

More information about the Testing mailing list