[PC-BSD Pbi-dev] PBI/Ports organizational structure..
tigersharke at gmail.com
Sat Sep 25 18:17:47 PDT 2010
Our PBIs (via PBIdir or Software Manager) are organized differently
than Ports (/usr/ports or on FreshPorts site). Each has its own sets of
categories that don't necessarily overlap. I am not sure exactly how to
synchronize the two, since each exists for its own purpose and derivitive
(PC-BSD vs FreeBSD) and level of expertise/background.. However, with a move
toward greater PBI-Port integration or inter-communication (in v9.0) it
seems to be something that should get resolved. Also, the Gramma factor
ought to be taken into consideration since PC-BSD is still meant to be an
easier to use variant and the simpler PBIdir organization may be best.
Some ideas how the disparity could be rectified:
- In the PBIdir or via Software Manager, indicate the location in the
port tree where applicable.
- Add categories/locations from the ports tree to PBIdir even though a
PBI may not populate it.
- Fully convert to the ports tree system of organization- unfortunately
this substantially reduces the ease-of-use/Gramma factor.
- Force FreeBSD ports structure to conform to the PBIdir categories. (not
likely; not a serious suggestion)
- Add an additional ports tab to the System Manager and indicate the port
tree location on the PBIdir site.
There could be a preference to toggle something of an expert mode that would
add the complexities of the ports tree. I believe the categories and
possibly future sub-categories setup with Software Manager or PBIdir is the
direction that things ought to go from an ease-of-use standpoint. I leave it
to all of you to hash out the details and methods to tackle this.
<this is not a self-destructing message> =D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pbi-dev