[PC-BSD Dev] Dev Digest, Vol 73, Issue 9

Curt Dox tigersharke at gmail.com
Fri Feb 14 12:06:08 PST 2014


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:00 PM, <dev-request at lists.pcbsd.org> wrote:

> Send Dev mailing list submissions to
>         dev at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         dev-request at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         dev-owner at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dev digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: samba4 (Kris Moore)
>    2. Re: samba4 (Hakisho Nukama)
>    3. Re: samba4 (Kris Moore)
>    4. Re: samba4 (John Hixson)
>    5. Re: samba4 (Kris Moore)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org>
> To: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:12:38 -0500
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] samba4
>  On 02/13/2014 01:47, Joe Maloney wrote:
>
> Do you guys have any thoughts about pulling in samba 4 now that IX has it
> FreeNAS?  I'm curious if the Active Directory tool would need a re-write?
>
>  Joe Maloney
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing listDev at lists.pcbsd.orghttp://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>  Joe,
>
> I figure we will wait for it to hit ports first, since it probably will
> require tweaking of a number of other packages that rely upon it. (KDE and
> other desktops come to mind)
>
> --
> Kris Moore
> PC-BSD Software
> iXsystems
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Hakisho Nukama <nukama at gmail.com>
> To: Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org>
> Cc: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:47:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] samba4
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org> wrote:
> > On 02/13/2014 01:47, Joe Maloney wrote:
> >
> > Do you guys have any thoughts about pulling in samba 4 now that IX has it
> > FreeNAS?  I'm curious if the Active Directory tool would need a re-write?
> >
> > Joe Maloney
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> > http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
> > Joe,
> >
> > I figure we will wait for it to hit ports first, since it probably will
> > require tweaking of a number of other packages that rely upon it. (KDE
> and
> > other desktops come to mind)
> >
> > --
> > Kris Moore
> > PC-BSD Software
> > iXsystems
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> > http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
>
> I'm not sure, but are you speaking of:
> https://www.freshports.org/net/samba41/ ? ;)
>
> Best Regards,
> Hakisho Nukama
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org>
> To: Hakisho Nukama <nukama at gmail.com>
> Cc: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:49:15 -0500
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] samba4
> On 02/14/2014 12:47, Hakisho Nukama wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org> wrote:
> >> On 02/13/2014 01:47, Joe Maloney wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you guys have any thoughts about pulling in samba 4 now that IX has
> it
> >> FreeNAS?  I'm curious if the Active Directory tool would need a
> re-write?
> >>
> >> Joe Maloney
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev mailing list
> >> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> >> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>
> >> Joe,
> >>
> >> I figure we will wait for it to hit ports first, since it probably will
> >> require tweaking of a number of other packages that rely upon it. (KDE
> and
> >> other desktops come to mind)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kris Moore
> >> PC-BSD Software
> >> iXsystems
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev mailing list
> >> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> >> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>
> > I'm not sure, but are you speaking of:
> > https://www.freshports.org/net/samba41/ ? ;)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hakisho Nukama
>
> Doh! I should have clarified, when it becomes the default in ports ;)
>
> We could try switching it in our EDGE branch, but I remember doing a
> previous switch and it wasn't fun :(
>
> Have you or any others tried it yet? Does it play nice with XBMC, KDE
> and the other depends we include?
>
> --
> Kris Moore
> PC-BSD Software
> iXsystems
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: John Hixson <john at pcbsd.org>
> To: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:49:01 -0800
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] samba4
>
> On 02/14/2014 09:49, Kris Moore wrote:
>
>> On 02/14/2014 12:47, Hakisho Nukama wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/13/2014 01:47, Joe Maloney wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do you guys have any thoughts about pulling in samba 4 now that IX has
>>>> it
>>>> FreeNAS?  I'm curious if the Active Directory tool would need a
>>>> re-write?
>>>>
>>>> Joe Maloney
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
>>>> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>>
>>>> Joe,
>>>>
>>>> I figure we will wait for it to hit ports first, since it probably will
>>>> require tweaking of a number of other packages that rely upon it. (KDE
>>>> and
>>>> other desktops come to mind)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kris Moore
>>>> PC-BSD Software
>>>> iXsystems
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
>>>> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>>
>>>>  I'm not sure, but are you speaking of:
>>> https://www.freshports.org/net/samba41/ ? ;)
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Hakisho Nukama
>>>
>> Doh! I should have clarified, when it becomes the default in ports ;)
>>
>> We could try switching it in our EDGE branch, but I remember doing a
>> previous switch and it wasn't fun :(
>>
>> Have you or any others tried it yet? Does it play nice with XBMC, KDE
>> and the other depends we include?
>>
>
> I'll chime in on this ;-) I don't know how it plays with those, but what I
> can tell you is that samba4 is samba4 + samba3, so all the samba3 tools are
> still included. I see no harm here as you can still use samba however you
> use it, without using the new samba4 functionality.
>
> - John
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org>
> To: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:02:09 -0500
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] samba4
> On 02/14/2014 13:49, John Hixson wrote:
> >
> > On 02/14/2014 09:49, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> On 02/14/2014 12:47, Hakisho Nukama wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.org> wrote:
> >>>> On 02/13/2014 01:47, Joe Maloney wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you guys have any thoughts about pulling in samba 4 now that IX
> >>>> has it
> >>>> FreeNAS?  I'm curious if the Active Directory tool would need a
> >>>> re-write?
> >>>>
> >>>> Joe Maloney
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Dev mailing list
> >>>> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> >>>> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>>>
> >>>> Joe,
> >>>>
> >>>> I figure we will wait for it to hit ports first, since it probably
> >>>> will
> >>>> require tweaking of a number of other packages that rely upon it.
> >>>> (KDE and
> >>>> other desktops come to mind)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Kris Moore
> >>>> PC-BSD Software
> >>>> iXsystems
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Dev mailing list
> >>>> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> >>>> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>>>
> >>> I'm not sure, but are you speaking of:
> >>> https://www.freshports.org/net/samba41/ ? ;)
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Hakisho Nukama
> >> Doh! I should have clarified, when it becomes the default in ports ;)
> >>
> >> We could try switching it in our EDGE branch, but I remember doing a
> >> previous switch and it wasn't fun :(
> >>
> >> Have you or any others tried it yet? Does it play nice with XBMC, KDE
> >> and the other depends we include?
> >
> > I'll chime in on this ;-) I don't know how it plays with those, but
> > what I can tell you is that samba4 is samba4 + samba3, so all the
> > samba3 tools are still included. I see no harm here as you can still
> > use samba however you use it, without using the new samba4 functionality.
> >
> > - John
> >>
> >
>
> Well, I'm willing to give it a shot then if it seems it won't cause too
> much trouble:
>
>
> https://github.com/pcbsd/pcbsd/commit/296dc5b468b702c5c96507fab6f5b3b49091b582
>
> I'll have this build in the next set of EDGE packages for testing :)
>
> --
> Kris Moore
> PC-BSD Software
> iXsystems
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
Doesn't ZFS have samba built-in that could be leveraged in some way?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140214/4c29e277/attachment.html>


More information about the Dev mailing list