[PC-BSD Dev] Dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3

Eric Nicholson jenicholson at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 16:36:34 PST 2008


On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:00 PM,  <dev-request at lists.pcbsd.org> wrote:
> Send Dev mailing list submissions to
>        dev at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        dev-request at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        dev-owner at lists.pcbsd.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Meeting && questions (Kris Moore)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:14:21 -0500
> From: Kris Moore <kris at pcbsd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Dev] Meeting && questions
> To: "A.Y." <yerenkow at uct.ua>
> Cc: dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> Message-ID: <4935971D.4050007 at pcbsd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> A.Y. wrote:
>> Hello all! how about make a small meeting-talk on irc at this week?
>> I'm free to any time.
>
> Sure! Lets plan for early next week if possible. I've still got a ton of
> stuff to get finished this week, after the Holiday last week :) Does
> Tuesday next week work for you?
>
>
>> And I have some questions.
>>
>> 1. Remember we were discussing about making smart gui "settings editor
>> for services" based on some definition? Is anyone looks into?
>> I thought about this, we could make a very general-use GUI for any
>> configuration files, that could be useful in future;
>> Currently I'm planning a project which will make a listener to
>> filesystem, and will trace all changes to specific files; after
>> file-change, check for syntax, validate, if validator provided, store it
>> to VCS, propose to user give a label (optional). So, syntax &&
>> validation part will be a kind of similar to settings options
>> definition. My goal - "user edit xorg.conf (or whatever), makes there
>> some mistake, save and - he see alert about syntax error;" or other case -
>> he changed same xorg.conf, boot unsuccessfull, he see text-based
>> interface and can choose right-one old saved version;
>
> I haven't started coding anything yet, but I think this is a feature we
> should add to the services tool here soon. If you just want me to setup
> the services tool to call a provided script / binary when the user
> clicks on "configure" that would be easy enough to do. However, if we
> want to do an entire syntax-driven configuration to provide configure
> gui's, that will take a lot longer, and require a lot of coding.
>
>
>> 2. Is technically possible such thing: on same FS have both i386 &&
>> amd64 files, for example
>> /boot32 /bin32, /lib32, /libexec32...
>> /boot64 /bin64, /lib64, /libexec64...
>>
>> and while booting choose one or other kernel?
>> if make changes in /etc/login.conf and whatever :)
>>
>> Or, if this isn't possible - how about make two partition for both 32 &
>> 64 versions root and one partition for home?
>
> I've not seen this done in BSD before, it may be possible, but I don't
> know how much hacking it would require :P
>
> I would think that the easiest thing to do would be 3 partition route,
> x32 and x64, then a home partition. But again, I',m not sure what kind
> of loader.conf tweaks will be needed to boot from either. If you can get
> one working, let me know and maybe we can support something like that
> down the road.
>

If you are talking simply having 32 / 64bit files being executed, then
can't you just just include the 32/64 libs that are required?

As far as booting a 32/64 kernel, I think a sufficent loader.conf
file could handle a kernel choice, as long as the libs are there
to support 32/64 environemnt, then either should work.

>> 3. If we have 2gb installation image for usb, why not create 5-6Gb image
>> of already installed PC-BSD, useage will be the same, dd to usb stick,
>> and we have live sluggish system :)
>> BTW, for DVD-live system we need writeable /home/user && /tmp, is this
>> all? could we make it too in 4,3Gb?
>
> I think it would be possible to do that, have a pre-built usb image
> which can be copied with dd to a media, and booted from. As for DVD, its
> a bit different, since we may need to do a uzip compressed FS to load
> from disk, so there's enough room for it all. Maybe even do the same
> thing with the USB media, so you can fit it into a 4GB USB stick or
> something.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from my research, to boot from USB the USB
stick/flash drive would need to have  a VFAT ( DOS ) filesystem for
the system bios
to recognize the USB stick/flash as a boot device then intialize the
boot process.

Is this possible in PC-BSD at the moment?

Having a bootable USB stick/flash drive would be very nice!


>
>> 4. About wine && gaming, did you guys thought about specific wine build
>> included in system, which will be updated a bit rarely?
>>
>
> Do you mean have one integrated, or just installed as we do now with the
> wine PBI? The only problem I've seen with integrating it, is that wine
> changes so often, and has so many regressions that whenever we would
> issue an online update to the base system, it could break the users wine
> programs. At least with the PBI method of wine, they can downgrade back
> to a previous wine release when a regression occurs :)
>
>> 5. new AsusEEEs have specific ethernet;
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2008-November/001172.html
>> Here are patch to src with driver.
>> I don't know how automated all system builds on server, so question is:
>> Is this possible to build patched kernel, and make it in PBIformat, or
>> in plain archive, and put it on pbidir.com, so users could test it?
>
>
> Has this patch been MFC to 7-Stable yet? I may be able to include it in
> 7.0.2 or 7.1 when it is :)
>
> As for a patch, you can build the kernel, and just tar bzip it for users
> to test. I wouldn't want to list it on pbidir, since thats more of a
> hard-core testing patch for users who want to try it out :)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.pcbsd.org
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
> End of Dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3
> **********************************
>


More information about the Dev mailing list